The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has begun the process of getting a default judgment in its case against Ooki DAO after the latter missed the deadline to respond to the lawsuit.
According to a Jan. 11 court filing, the regulator has requested the court for an entry of default against the decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), stating it had missed the deadline to answer or otherwise defend as instructed by the summons.
If approved, the entry of default will establish Ooki DAO has failed to plead or defend itself in court and will no longer be able to answer or respond to the suit.
An entry of default is the first step in the process of gaining a default judgment — a ruling handed down by the court when the defendant fails to defend a lawsuit.
Cast your vote now!
The lawsuit in question was filed by the CFTC on Sep. 22, 2022, alleging Ooki DAO of illegally offering “leveraged and margined” digital asset commodity transactions to retail traders along with failing to enact a way to identify customers and “engaging in activities only registered futures commission merchants (FCM) can perform.”
The lawsuit was served to the DAO through its help chat box along with a notice on its online forum.
In Dec. 2022, District Judge William Orrick ordered the regulator to serve Tom Bean and Kyle Kistner, the founders of a predecessor trading platform to Ooki DAO, adding the CFTC “should serve at least one identifiable Token Holder if that is possible.”
Bringing forward the lawsuit without clear regulatory guidelines had many criticize the regulator. CFTC commissioner, Summer Mersinger, even called the action a “regulation by enforcement” approach.
Read the full article here